Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



Username Post: Individual efficiency stats 2007-2014
Stuart Suss 
PhD Student
Posts: 1439

Loc: Chester County, Pennsylva...
Reg: 11-21-04
03-11-19 12:57 PM - Post#280631    
    In response to 1LotteryPick1969

<<Any particular reason why Llewellyn's rating is so low?>>

The Win Score (WS, column G) represents a total of the Shooting Efficiency (column U) plus the efficiency number for everything else (rebounds, turnovers, etc . . .)

Gabe Llwellyn (-44.5) and Desmond Cambridge (-59) had very poor shooting efficiencies. Gabe's +17 on everything else still left him at -27.5. Desmond's +21 on everything else still left him at -38. A similar fate befell Gabe Stefanini (+35 on everything else) and Quinton Adlesh (+25.5 on everything else).

On the other hand, if you are Matt Morgan with a shooting efficiency of +70, you can get away with being only +5.5 on everything else.

Or you can be Jordan Bruner, +8.0 on shooting and +78.0 on everything else.

NOTE: You are viewing an individual Post. View the Entire Topic




Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.011 seconds.   Total Queries: 5   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 09:15 PM
Top