Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



Username Post: Penn II
SRP 
Postdoc
Posts: 4919

Reg: 02-04-06
02-14-24 10:56 PM - Post#363207    
    In response to james

Supposedly there is concern on the part of players about others in the locker room knowing what they're getting. Hence little pushback against the very common NDAs that go with these collective "NIL" deals.

What cracks me up is the bait-and-switch by which NIL was sold by all the columnists and promoters. It is indeed very reasonable that if a kid gets famous by playing college sports, then he ought to be able to monetize that fame. It is another matter entirely to have boosters paying players who are largely unknown to play at their schools, with a sham NIL cover--nobody would have agreed to that had it been presented that way.
NOTE: You are viewing an individual Post. View the Entire Topic




Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.127 seconds.   Total Queries: 13   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 02:59 PM
Top