sparman
PhD Student
Posts: 1348
Reg: 12-08-04
|
02-24-24 10:29 AM - Post#363867
In response to SRP
Kind of a head scratching game to me. The score says it was a clear win and during most of the 2H it looked like Tigers were dominant, although I kept thinking H looked bigger and more physical but just couldn't shoot very well. Then I saw the box score that said the H FG percentage was actually better.
Then I thought maybe PU significantly outrebounded them. But the box score says the advantage was 4.
Then I thought maybe this was a significant foul disparity game. But the box score says we only had 2 fewer fouls called, albeit we made 5 more FT.
Then I thought maybe TOs were the difference, but the box score says only a margin of 3.
So I can only conclude PU had the cumulative benefit of doing a lot of little things just a little better than the opponent, st least enough to overcome a clear shooting off night. Just seems odd to me.
|
