palestra38
Professor
Posts: 32835
Reg: 11-21-04
|
02-29-24 01:08 PM - Post#364158
In response to 13otto
AsiaSunset Said:
This doesn’t mean that I don’t think that the coaches are not fair game or that critiques of game strategy or even player performance is in anyway something we should be thinking twice about.
While we all knew what he meant, there indeed are 2 necessary changes to get the meaning right on paper. Let me attempt to re-write it:
AsiaSunset Said:
This doesn’t mean that I don’t think that the coaches are fair game or that critiques of game strategy or even player performance is in any way something we shouldn't be thinking twice about.
|
Silver Maple
Postdoc
Posts: 3778
Loc: Westfield, New Jersey
Reg: 11-23-04
|
02-29-24 03:07 PM - Post#364159
In response to palestra38
Or, even more simply:
- The job performance of the coaches is fair game.
- It's OK to criticize game strategy and specific aspects of on-court player performance.
In other words, don't get personal, and don't make assumptions about anybody's internal motivations.
|
palestra38
Professor
Posts: 32835
Reg: 11-21-04
|
02-29-24 03:23 PM - Post#364160
In response to Silver Maple
You're the Hemingway of this Board.
|
Penndemonium
PhD Student
Posts: 1900
Reg: 11-29-04
|
02-29-24 07:04 PM - Post#364166
In response to Silver Maple
Or, even more simply:
- The job performance of the coaches is fair game.
- It's OK to criticize game strategy and specific aspects of on-court player performance.
In other words, don't get personal, and don't make assumptions about anybody's internal motivations.
Hmm... maybe we should put this on the header of the Basketball-U website.
|
