sparman
PhD Student
Posts: 1357
Reg: 12-08-04
|
05-31-24 12:00 AM - Post#368901
In response to Stuart Suss
Fair points. I should have said the Alston decision made clear that restrictions on NILs, as non-educational benefits, would almost certainly be struck down, as you say.
You are also right about the statute of limitations aspect:
"The reason the back pay goes to 2016 is due to the statute of limitations — the limit on how far back certain legal claims can be addressed. For the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, there is a statute of 'four years from the date of the most recent injury,' hence the 2016-17 season cut-off which was four years prior to the NCAA allowing name, image and likeness compensation."
https://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2024/05/duke...
|
