sparman
PhD Student
Posts: 1366
Reg: 12-08-04
|
05-30-24 11:00 PM - Post#368901
In response to Stuart Suss
Fair points. I should have said the Alston decision made clear that restrictions on NILs, as non-educational benefits, would almost certainly be struck down, as you say.
You are also right about the statute of limitations aspect:
"The reason the back pay goes to 2016 is due to the statute of limitations — the limit on how far back certain legal claims can be addressed. For the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, there is a statute of 'four years from the date of the most recent injury,' hence the 2016-17 season cut-off which was four years prior to the NCAA allowing name, image and likeness compensation."
https://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2024/05/duke...
|
SRP
Postdoc
Posts: 4954
Reg: 02-04-06
|
06-17-24 02:54 PM - Post#369082
In response to sparman
A surprisingly sane, almost olds-school NCAA "student-athlete" perspective, from Sally Jenkins, of all people:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2024/06/16/c...
|
Streamers
Professor
Posts: 9270
Loc: NW Philadelphia
Reg: 11-21-04
|
06-18-24 07:45 AM - Post#369087
In response to SRP
I’m glad she thought this through. I know I hadn’t. Think this analysis will find its way to Hanover?
|
