Anonymous
|
11-23-04 05:21 PM - Post#173
I know his ratings are notoriously out of whack as the season starts, but how is UP tied with the Lions as a top 60 team with its start? And how is Harvard, which played the boys from the Indiana plains tough, down at 246 and trailing Cornell after the Big Red was overrun by the Meeks of the East?
|
internetter
Postdoc
Posts: 3400
Loc: Los Angeles
Reg: 11-21-04
|
Re: What's up with Sagarin? a different ranking 11-23-04 06:16 PM - Post#174
In response to
As of Monday's Sagarin, http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/bkt0405.htm 106 Pennsylvania 201 Columbia, 299 Harvard, 302 Cornell
|
BRHPr91
goober
Posts: 75
Loc: Rochester, NY
Reg: 11-21-04
|
Re: What's up with Sagarin? a different ranking 11-23-04 06:30 PM - Post#175
In response to internetter
The introductory note at the site makes clear that the teams' "starting ratings," which are based on last year's result, are given weight in this year's ratings until a few weeks into the season, when all the teams are "connected" to every other team either by playing them or by having a common opponent. At that point, starting ratings are dropped.
Sagarin's ratings mean nothing until at least January.
The fans may or may not like a lot of passing, but I know they don't like losing. -- Pete Carril |
|
light blue heavy
maximus
Posts: 164
Reg: 11-22-04
|
Re: What's up with Sagarin? a different ranking 11-23-04 07:18 PM - Post#176
In response to BRHPr91
Thanks, BRHPr. I didn't know that.
and nice quote for the sig
|